Forrest Street
Name:
Forrest Street
Address:
Between 84 and 100 Forrest St.
NJDEP ID No.
775706
GROUNDWATER
January 2022: Groundwater Remedial Action Work Plan Garfield Avenue Group Sites
Appendices
Appendix A-1: Relevant Submittals: Groundwater Remedial Investigation Report, Final
Appendix A-2: Relevant Submittals: Responses to Comments on Definition of Low Permeability
Appendix B: Permit-By-Rule Requests and Authorizations – Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III IRMs
Appendix C: Geotechnical Evaluation of Active Remedies at Hudson County Chromate Site 199
Appendix D: Field Sampling Plan/Quality Assurance Project Plan and Field Change Notifications for the Groundwater Interim Remedial Measures
Regulatory Forms
Case Inventory Document
Cover Certification Form
Public Notification Form
January 2022: Groundwater Remedial Investigation Report
Appendices
Appendix A Previous Reports
Appendix B: Borehole Geophysical Logging Results
Appendix C: Summary of Historical Groundwater Elevations
Appendix D: Summary of Pressure Transducer Data – June 2016 to June 2017
Appendix E: Implications of Soil Heterogeneities on Fate and Transport Appendix F: Boring Logs
Appendix F: Boring Logs
Appendix G: Evaluation of Permeable Zones within the Basal Till
Appendix H: Receptor Evaluation
Appendix I: Utility Maps
Appendix J.1: Well Records for Newly Installed Monitoring Wells
Appendix J.2: Monitoring Well Decommissioning Records
Appendix K: Groundwater Low-Flow Sampling Records
Appendix L.1: Historical Groundwater Analytical Data - Cr+6 and CCPW Metals
Appendix L.2: Historical Groundwater Analytical Data - Non-CCPW Metals
Appendix L.3: Historical Groundwater Analytical Data - VOCs
Appendix L.4: Historical Groundwater Analytical Data - SVOCs
Appendix M: Laboratory Reports
Appendix N: Data Validation Memoranda
Appendix O: HAZSITE Electronic Data Deliverables (EDDs)
Appendix P: Figures Depicting Groundwater RI Results for CCPW Metals, Non-CCPW Metals, VOCs, and SVOCs
Appendix Q: Analytical Data and Communications Related to MGP-Related DNAPL
Tables
Table 2-1 Summary of Investigation Sites
Table 3-1 Top of Bedrock Elevation Data
Table 3-2 Groundwater Elevations
Table 3-3 Summary of Vertical Hydraulic Gradients
Table 3-4 Groundwater Elevation Data – August 2020 and February 2021
Table 3-5 Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates
Table 3-6 Jar Shake Test Results
Table 4-1 Monitoring Well Network
Table 4-2 Groundwater Sampling Summary
Table 4-3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Sample Summary
Table 5-1 Groundwater Analytical Results – Cr+6 and CCPW Metals
Table 5-2 Groundwater Analytical Results – Non-CCPW Metals
Table 5-3 Groundwater Analytical Results – VOCs
Table 5-4 Groundwater Analytical Results – SVOCs
Table 5-5 Analytical Results from Quality Assurance Samples – Cr+6 and Metals
Table 5-6 Analytical Results from Quality Assurance Samples – VOCs
Table 5-7 Analytical Results from Quality Assurance Samples – SVOCs
Table 5-8 Density Analysis Results
Figures
Figure 1-1 USGS Site Location Map
Figure 1-2 Site Plan
Figure 2-1 Source Areas
Figure 3-1 Approximate Extent of Meadow Mat
Figure 3-2 Regional Surficial Geology Cross-Section
Figure 3-3 Regional Bedrock Geology
Figure 3-4 Top of Bedrock Surface
Figure 3-5 Groundwater Elevation Contour Map – Shallow Water-Bearing Zone
Figure 3-6 Groundwater Elevation Contour Map – Intermediate Water-Bearing Zone
Figure 3-7 Groundwater Elevation Contour Map – Deep Water-Bearing Zone
Figure 3-8 Vertical Hydraulic Gradients Between Shallow and Intermediate Water-Bearing Zones
Figure 3-9 Vertical Hydraulic Gradients Between Intermediate and Deep Water-Bearing Zones
Figure 3-10 Vertical Hydraulic Gradients Between Deep and Bedrock Water-Bearing Zones
Figure 3-11 Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Results
Figure 4-1 Locations of Monitoring Wells, Sumps, and Temporary Screening Points
Figure 5-1 Fence Diagram A-A’
Figure 5-2 Fence Diagram B-B’
Figure 5-3 Fence Diagram C-C’
Figure 5-4 Fence Diagram D-D’
Figure 5-6 Fence Diagram F-F’ and G-G’
Figure 5-7 Fence Diagram H-H’
Figure 5-8 Fence Diagram I-I’
Figure 5-9 Fence Diagram J-J’
Figure 5-10 Distribution of Total Chromium in the Shallow Water-bearing Zone
Figure 5-11 Distribution of Total Chromium in the Intermediate Water-bearing Zone
Figure 5-12 Distribution of Total Chromium in the Deep Water-bearing Zone
Figure 5-13 Distribution of Total Chromium in the Basal Till and Weathered Bedrock
Figure 6-1 Area Requiring Additional Investigation in Bedrock
NJDEP Forms
Case Inventory Document
Cover Cert Form
Public Notice Form
CEA Revised
CEA for Historic Fill
SOIL
June 2022: Consent Judgment Compliance Letter - Forrest Street Soil (AOC FS-1A, AOC FS-1B and AOC FS-1C)
November 2019: Remedial Action Work Plan for Current Use of Forrest Street and Forrest Street Properties
Tables
Table 2-1: Applicable Soil Remediation Standards, Screening Levels, and Cleanup Criteria
Table 2-2: Cr+6 Analytical Results for Soil Compared to Chromium Soil Cleanup Criterion
Table 2-3: Cr+6 and Chromium Analytical Results for Concrete Compared to Chromium Soil Cleanup Criteria
Table 2-4: CCPW Metals Analytical Results for Soil Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Table 2-5: CCPW Metals Analytical Results in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to DIGWSSL and IGWSRS-GAG
Table 2-6: Select SVOC Analytical Results for Soil Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Table 2-7: Select SVOC Analytical Results in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Levels
Table 2-8: Benzene Analytical Results for Soil Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Table 2-9: Benzene Analytical Results in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Levels
Table 6-1: Remedial Alternatives Evaluation
Figures
Figure 1-1: USGS Site Location Map
Figure 1-2: Site Map and Utilities
Figure 1-3: Support of Excavation Offsets
Figure 4-1: Locations of Visually Observed CCPW in Soil
Figure 4-2: Sample Map for Hexavalent Chromium in Soil Compared to Chromium Soil Cleanup Criterion
Figure 4-3: Sample Map for Hexavalent Chromium and Chromium in Concrete Compared to Chromium Soil Cleanup Criteria
Figure 4-4: Sample Map for CCPW Metals in Soil Compared to Direct Contact Soil Remediation Standards
Figure 4-5: Sample Map for CCPW Metals in Soil Compared to DIGWSSL and IGWSRS-GAG
Figure 4-6: Sample Map for SVOCs in Soil Compared to Direct Contact Soil Remediation Standards
Figure 4-7: Sample Map for SVOCs in Soil Compared to DIGWSSL
Figure 4-8: Sample Map for Benzene in Soil Compared to Direct Contact Soil Remediation Standards
Figure 4-9: Sample Map for Benzene in Soil Compared to DIGWSSL
Figure 5-1: Extents of Current-Use Remediation Areas
Figure 5-2: Forrest Street and Forrest Street Properties Areas of Concern
Figure 6-1: Restoration As Built
Figure 7-1: Engineering Control Extents and Selected Remedial Actions
Figure 7-2: Details: 84 Forrest Street Loading Dock
Figure 7-3: Details: Boiler Room Basement
Figure 8-1: Extents of Capillary Break
Appendices
Appendix A – IGWSRS-GAG and ARS Acceptance Documentation
Appendix B – Sanborn Maps
Appendix C – Aerial Photographs
Appendix D – 50th Percentile Groundwater Elevation Calculation
Appendix E – Documentation of EDD Submission
Appendix F: Email Correspondence
Appendix G: 114-MW44A Monitoring Well Documentation
Appendix H: 90 Forrest Street Boiler Room Basement: Survey
Appendix I: Technical Memorandum: 100 Forrest St. Proposed Work Plan
Appendix J: Product Specifications
Appendix K: Technical Memorandum: Summary of Proposed Forrest Street Restoration Activities – Skyways and Roadway
Appendix L: Current-Use Engineering Controls Inspection/Maintenance/Repair Plan
Appendix M: Forrest Future Residential-Use Conceptual Excavation Plan
Appendix N: Draft Deed Notices and Draft Notice in Lieu of Deed Notice
Appendix O: Preliminary Remedial Cost Estimates
Regulatory Forms
September 2019: Remedial Action Report – Forrest Street
Tables
Table 1-1: Areas of Concern
Table 3-1: Soil Remediation Standards/Criteria
Table 5-1: Cr+6 Analytical Results for In-Place Soil Compared to Chromium Soil Cleanup Criterion
Table 5-2: CCPW Metals Analytical Results for In-Place Soil Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Table 5-3: CCPW Metals Analytical Results in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Level and Soil Remediation Standards
Table 5-4: Select SVOC Analytical Results for In-Place Soil Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Table 5-5: Select SVOC Analytical Results in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Levels
Table 5-6: Benzene Analytical Results for In-Place Soil Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Table 5-7: Benzene Analytical Results in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Level
Table 5-8: Field Change Notification Tracking Sheet
Figures
Figure 1-1: USGS Site Location Map
Figure 1-2: Site Plan for Forrest Street
Figure 5-1: Sample Map for Cr+6 Compared to Chromium Soil Cleanup Criterion
Figure 5-2: Sample Map for CCPW Metals Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Figure 5-3: Sample Map for CCPW Metals in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Level and Soil Remediation Standards
Figure 5-4: Sample Map for Select SVOCs Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Figure 5-5: Sample Map for Select SVOCs in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Levels
Figure 5-6: Sample Map for Benzene Compared to Soil Remediation Standards
Figure 5-7: Sample Map for Benzene in the Unsaturated Soil Zone Compared to IGW Soil Screening Level
Figure 7-1: Forrest Street and Forrest Street Properties Restoration As-Built
Figure 7-2: Capillary Break Extents and Cross Sections – Forrest Street
Appendices
Appendix A: Historical Water Table Elevations
Appendix B: Permits and Approvals
Appendix C: Laboratory Analytical Reports
Appendix C-1: Laboratory Analytical Reports
Appendix C-2: Documentation of EDD Submittal
Appendix D: Data Validation Reports
Appendix E: As-Built Diagrams
Appendix F: Notice in Lieu of Deed Notice
Appendix G: Boring Logs
Appendix H: Hazardous Waste Disposal Documentation
Appendix I: Non-Hazardous Waste Disposal Documentation
Appendix J: Clean Fill Documentation
Appendix J-1: Clean Fill Documentation - Dense-Graded Aggregate and Open Grade Stone Load Reports
Appendix J-2: Quarry Information and Analytical Data Reports
September 2018: Remedial Action Work Plan
Tables
Table 1-1: Achievement of NJDEP Conditions for Approval
Table 1-2: Non-Residential Chrome Chemical Production Waste Site Property Owners
Table 3-1: Compounds Exceeding Regulatory Criteria On or Emanating from Site 114
Table 3-2: Remedial Standards for Soil
Table 5-1: Sample Summary
Figures and Drawings
Figure 1-1: USGS Site Location Map (1981)
Figure 1-1A: Site Map
Drawing 1-2: 2011 Existing Conditions Plan (Phases 1 & 2)
Drawing 1-3: 2011 Existing Conditions Plan (Phase 3)
Drawing 1-4: Cross Section A-A’
Drawing 1-5: Cross Section B-B’
Drawing 1-6: Cross Section C-C’
Drawing 1-7: Cross Section D-D’
Drawing 1-8: Cross Section E-E’
Drawing 1-9: Cross Section F-F’
Drawing 1-10: Cross Section G-G’
Drawing 1-11: Cross Section H-H’
Drawing 1-12: Cross Section I-I’
Drawing 1-13: Cross Section J-J’
Drawing 1-14: Cross Section K-K’
Drawing 1-15: Cross Section L-L’
Drawing 1-16: Cross Section M-M’
Drawing 6-1: Conceptual Phase 1 Site Preparation and Erosion Control
Drawing 6-2: Conceptual Phase 2 Site Preparation and Erosion Control
Drawing 6-3: Conceptual Phase 3 Site Preparation and Erosion Control
Drawing 6-4: Conceptual Site Preparation and Erosion Control Details
Drawing 6-5: Conceptual Phase 1 Excavation Plan
Drawing 6-6: Conceptual Phase 1 Excavation Plan (Northern Excavation)
Drawing 6-7: Conceptual Phase 2 Excavation Plan
Drawing 6-8: Conceptual Phase 3 Excavation Plan
Drawing 6-9: Conceptual Sheet Pile Details
Drawing 7-1: IRM Final Grading and Water Treatment System Secondary Containment
Drawing 7-2: Water Treatment System Modutank Secondary Containment
Drawing 7-3: Typical Dewatering Plan
Drawing 8-1: Extent of Free-Phase MGP Contamination
Drawing 11-1: Stormwater Restoration and Final Grading Plan
Drawing 11-2: Restoration Details
Drawing 17-1: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-2: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-3: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-4: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-5: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-6: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-7: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-8: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-9: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-10: Garfield Avenue Group Remedial Progress Plan
Drawing 17-11: Master Schedule Summary
Drawing 17-12: Excavation Sequence
Appendices
Appendix A: Air Monitoring Plan (AMP)
Appendix B: Dust Control Plan (DCP)
Appendix C: Traffic Safety and Control Plan (TSCP)
Appendix D: Soil and Stockpile Management Plan (SSMP)
Appendix E: Health and Safety Plan (HASP)
Appendix F: Exhibit A – Excavation Plan
Appendix G: Example Draft Deed Notice
Appendix H: Receptor Evaluation
Appendix I: Level 3 Survey Performed by Enviroscan
Appendix J: Copy of Approved Permits
Appendix K: Contingency and Communications Plan
Appendix L: Capillary Break Design Report
August 2018: Supplemental Soil Remedial Investigation Report
Tables
Table 1-1: Summary of Investigation Locations
Table 4-1: Sample Investigation Details
Table 4-2: Soil Sample Summary
Table 4-3: Analytical Results - Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure
Table 5-1: Analytical Results - Hexavalent Chromium and CCPW Metals Compared to SRS – Garfield Avenue Group
Table 5-2: Analytical Results - Hexavalent Chromium and CCPW Metals Compared to SRS – Northern Canal Area Site
Table 5-3: Analytical Results - Hexavalent Chromium and CCPW Metals Compared to IGW SSL/SRS – Garfield Avenue Group
Table 5-4: Analytical Results – SVOCs Compared to SRS – Garfield Avenue Group
Table 5-5: Analytical Results – SVOCs Compared IGW SSL – Garfield Avenue Group
Table 5-6: Analytical Results – VOCs Compared to SRS – Garfield Avenue Group
Table 5-7: Analytical Results – VOCs Compared to IGW SSL – Garfield Avenue Group
Table 5-8: Analytical Results – PCBs Compared to SRS – Garfield Avenue Group
Table 5-9: Analytical Results – PCBs Compared to IGW SSL – Garfield Avenue Group
Figures
Figure 1-1: USGS Site Location Map
Figure 1-2: Site Plan
Figure 2-1: Garfield Avenue Group Sites Interim Remedial Measures
Figure 4-1: Investigation Locations
Figure 5-1: CCPW Material Observed in Soil Borings – Northwest Garfield Avenue Sites
Figure 5-2: CCPW Material Observed in Soil Borings – Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites
Figure 5-3: CCPW Material Observed in Soil Borings – Southern Garfield Avenue Sites
Figure 5-4: CCPW Material Observed in Soil Borings – Northern Canal Area
Figure 5-5: Soil Comparison to NJDEP CrSCC - Northwest Garfield Avenue Sites, Hexavalent Chromium
Figure 5-6: Soil Comparison to NJDEP CrSCC - Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, Hexavalent Chromium
Figure 5-7: Soil Comparison to NJDEP CrSCC - Southern Garfield Avenue Sites, Hexavalent Chromium
Figure 5-8: Soil Comparison to NJDEP CrSCC – Northern Canal Area, Hexavalent Chromium
Figure 5-9: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS - Northwest Garfield Avenue Sites, CCPW Metals
Figure 5-10: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS - Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, CCPW Metals
Figure 5-11: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS - Southern Garfield Avenue Sites, CCPW Metals
Figure 5-12: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS – Northerm Canal Area, CCPW Metals
Figure 5-13: Soil Comparison to NJDEP IGW SRS/SSL - Northwest Garfield Avenue Sites, CCPW Metals
Figure 5-14: Soil Comparison to NJDEP IGW SRS/SSL - Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, CCPW Metals
Figure 5-15: Soil Comparison to NJDEP IGW SRS/SSL - Southern Garfield Avenue Sites, CCPW Metals
Figure 5-16: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS – Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, Group 1 SVOCs
Figure 5-17: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS – Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, Group 2 SVOCs
Figure 5-18: Soil Comparison to NJDEP IGW SSL– Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, SVOCs
Figure 5-19: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS - Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, VOCs
Figure 5-20: Soil Comparison to NJDEP IGW SSL - Northeast Garfield Avenue Sites, VOCs
Figure 5-21: Soil Comparison to NJDEP SRS/IGW SSL - Garfield Avenue Sites, Total PCBs
Appendices
Appendix A: Remedial Investigation Report (RIR) - Soil, Garfield Avenue Group Non-Residential
Appendix B: FOR-005 Additional Forrest Street Remedial Investigation – Soil & Groundwater Technical Memorandum
Appendix C: Halsted Building Remedial Investigation Results – Soil Technical Memorandum
Appendix D: Northern Morris Canal Investigation – Berry Lane Park to Communipaw Avenue Technical Memorandum
Appendix E: Supplemental East-West Geologic Cross-Section
Appendix F: Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) Calculations
Appendix G: Data Validation Reports
Appendix H: Laboratory Data Packages
Appendix I: Boring Logs
Appendix J: Historical Data Verification Technical Memorandum
Appendix K: PPG/Honeywell Site 199 Agreement
Miscellany
Cover/Certification Form
Case Inventory Document
Receptor Evaluation
ABOUT US
|
PROGRESS REPORTS
|
CLEANUP REPORTS
|
HEALTH & SAFETY
|
CONTACT
© 2009 - 2023 CHROMIUM CLEANUP PARTNERSHIP